That was the case last year Handler with only 10 teams in the E Grade and it worked a lot better! The 10 teams were virtually aligned with the A Grade clubs.
I think this year with extra sides coming in to the league the teams had to go somewhere which is fine but I can’t see why an extra grade couldn’t have been created to split the E Grade.
To me Scarborough who had 3’s and 4’s (in F and G grade) should have been in E’s as well and then there would have been an even 16 teams or even better two grades of 8 (I notice Scarbs F grade has not lost a game all year!). They would all play each other once Home and Away then.
I think two even grades of 8 teams playing each other a few times would be better than an uneven grade of 16. The top 8 teams could be the A grade clubs mainly and bottom 8 the rest. You could even have some sort of play off at the end of the year between winners of the two grades or a cross over final 8 system maybe? Or could we go down the conference path and have two even grades who play their own conference teams twice and then 4 teams from the other conference? Would create a bit of interest I think but maybe nightmares for fixturing!!!
F and G grade (for sides with only a 3’s team, or 5ths!) would lose the Scarborough teams but still would have had 9 teams in each grade which is still ok in terms of fixturing - just gives them two byes during the year.
Maybe Scarbs put the 4’s team in late and it was too late to change fixtures but something to consider for next year.