There was a scheduled 15’s junior development game on against SF at Freo oval on Thursday 15th July and EP couldn’t field a side.
Does anyone know what happened???

TheRock - 17 July 2010 12:38 AM

There was a scheduled 15’s junior development game on against SF at Freo oval on Thursday 15th July and EP couldn’t field a side.
Does anyone know what happened???

Thank god their league team turned up yesterday Rock!! did yours??

Seriously can someone from EP shed any light on this? pretty poor if what the Rock has suggested occurred....

Balla from what I saw in EP colts they haven’t got much in the u/18 department as well......EP colts teams used to be traditionally so strong....hopefully from an EF perspective Woewodin plays EF colts team against SF league side in the derby in a fortnight!

EF and Cl shaping up for yet another appearance in he colts finals, probably one or both of them will be in the GF. From the 1970s (this data is avilable from the WAFC) onwards these two sides have a massive number of finals appearances while many other clubs have modest results at best.

It’s an absolute dsigrace how the WAFC allows these two clubs to have been so favoured with junior zones. It’s obvious also in the number of draft picks that come from these two clubs.

The WAFC does absolutley f&^ck all about it, saying that the zones are worked out on numbers only. If that’s the case why not have EF and Cl swap their zone with a neighbouring club and see what happens.

It’s sickening when EF and Cl gloat about their high percentage of home grown players in the league team. Of course they have a high percentage, why would they need to look elsewhere???

EF and Cl should never complain about anything, they have been favoured for years. To the WAFC - let’s have a level playing field for all clubs, starting from junior zones!

epfc2002 - 18 July 2010 10:52 AM

EF and Cl shaping up for yet another appearance in he colts finals, probably one or both of them will be in the GF. From the 1970s (this data is avilable from the WAFC) onwards these two sides have a massive number of finals appearances while many other clubs have modest results at best.

It’s an absolute dsigrace how the WAFC allows these two clubs to have been so favoured with junior zones. It’s obvious also in the number of draft picks that come from these two clubs.

The WAFC does absolutley f&^ck all about it, saying that the zones are worked out on numbers only. If that’s the case why not have EF and Cl swap their zone with a neighbouring club and see what happens.

It’s sickening when EF and Cl gloat about their high percentage of home grown players in the league team. Of course they have a high percentage, why would they need to look elsewhere???

EF and Cl should never complain about anything, they have been favoured for years. To the WAFC - let’s have a level playing field for all clubs, starting from junior zones!

one of the most pathetic posts i have read on footygoss - cannot even be bothered trying to explain!

YOU KNOB EPFC2002

EPFC2002, can you explain to me why the WAFL had to give EF a part of SF and Perth junior zone then?.....not favouritism mate....a recent WAFC report showed compared to other WAFL zones EF had a diminshing junior population and a growing aged population within their footy zones.....EF has no longer the Dongara area any more or the Central/North Midlands anymore.....both area’s have gone to Perth I believe!

and then sf got a part of ef’s in kardinya and we got a bit of perth’s in roleystone and lost some more to peel and gave some to ef etc etc etc.

It just messes up any long term planning and club structure and proper development i reckon.

epfc2002 - 18 July 2010 10:52 AM

EF and Cl shaping up for yet another appearance in he colts finals, probably one or both of them will be in the GF. From the 1970s (this data is avilable from the WAFC) onwards these two sides have a massive number of finals appearances while many other clubs have modest results at best.

It’s an absolute dsigrace how the WAFC allows these two clubs to have been so favoured with junior zones. It’s obvious also in the number of draft picks that come from these two clubs.

The WAFC does absolutley f&^ck all about it, saying that the zones are worked out on numbers only. If that’s the case why not have EF and Cl swap their zone with a neighbouring club and see what happens.

It’s sickening when EF and Cl gloat about their high percentage of home grown players in the league team. Of course they have a high percentage, why would they need to look elsewhere???

EF and Cl should never complain about anything, they have been favoured for years. To the WAFC - let’s have a level playing field for all clubs, starting from junior zones!

The WAFC have been updated the zones for each club every 5 years for a while to keep a level playing field.
Concentrate on building up your zones and stop posting absolute rubbish.

It probably starts by trying to put together 44 players in two 15’s development sides!!!

It gets bloody worse.

I hear now that EP couldn’t/didn’t field a little league side at EF last week.

Can someone please confirm this. If this is true I wonder what is happening in your junior zone.

and Micale has got the nerve to whinge - winnett what is going on over there?