The one differing opinion in the Media comes from PETER VLAHOS who reckons he saw what WOLFENDEN Did.Of course people will obviously say PETER says that with an EAST PERTH tint.
On many occassions he has done exactly that,but there are others(with EAST PERTH involved)where he has been a FENCE SITTER.Can’t say exactly on what,but the Phrase that springs to mind with him is,...."Can I just play Devil’s advocate for a moment?"That isn’t always convincing,however I am willing to take him at his Word on this for some reason.
If he WAS right in what he saw,would EAST PERTH take the Case to the COMMISSION with a Letter of Complaint?And what action would the letter recommend?