Zac Beek reported again!!!

dogman - 26 June 2010 10:36 PM

Zac Beek reported again!!!

surprise surpise

Good form at the tribunal !!!

was he? didnt see that must have been a minor incident??

Zac Beeck report is laughable as there was nothing to it. I just hope common sense prevails and it is thrown out because I didnt realise bumping some one deserves a report.

Terrible umpiring beforeh and finished off with this report. Dont be suprised if they try to make it stick though through the tribunial although clearly there was no contact to the head.

Not suprising however a contact similar in nature to the michael swan report earlier in the year went unpunished however to one of our guys..

Must have the wrong bloke, the Beek is an angel. Next you will try and tell me that Spandexman is on suspension yet again.

Not quite.Whatever SOB STORY SWANS told about Spaander must have worked wonders.He’s only doing it tough for 3 games instead of 4.

Case withdrawn before it reached the tribunial.
how many keyboard heros will come here who didnt even see the incident but had him convicted to apologise?

fact is when the umpire tells the player he reported him for bumping too hard its time to go play netball.

Grassy, was that due to an early plea or did it go through to the tribunal?

As far as I know,he got 4 weeks.SWANS appealed a day or two after and got a week Cut off.